<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church Videos Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/</link>
	<description>Sharing technology ideas for LDS parents and youth</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I was so excited to see that you finally had downloadable videos (right now I have to digitize all of the clips I use for teaching sunday school).  THEN I noticed that (as usual) they are only available in Windows Media format *bubble bursts*.  I guess I'll keep digitizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so excited to see that you finally had downloadable videos (right now I have to digitize all of the clips I use for teaching sunday school).  THEN I noticed that (as usual) they are only available in Windows Media format *bubble bursts*.  I guess I&#8217;ll keep digitizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Roger-

You actually have a good point. As I read your comment I agree.  Windows media is better than nothing, but to reach out to more people using flash format would be ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger-</p>
<p>You actually have a good point. As I read your comment I agree.  Windows media is better than nothing, but to reach out to more people using flash format would be ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Hey this is very cool!  I love this idea and think its awesome.  Thanks for providing this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey this is very cool!  I love this idea and think its awesome.  Thanks for providing this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2006/09/18/church-videos-online/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>This is exciting!  I wonder if it would be good to use the Adobe Flash format, which, by Adobe's pronouncement, is the most universally used video format on the web?  They say 97.3% of all computers have Flash, whereas 84% have Windows media.  Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exciting!  I wonder if it would be good to use the Adobe Flash format, which, by Adobe&#8217;s pronouncement, is the most universally used video format on the web?  They say 97.3% of all computers have Flash, whereas 84% have Windows media.  Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
