<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .xxx Domain for Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/</link>
	<description>Sharing technology ideas for LDS parents and youth</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ldsWebguy &#187; LDS Resources to Stop Pornography on the Web</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>ldsWebguy &#187; LDS Resources to Stop Pornography on the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday, I blogged about the revived proposal to create a .xxx domain for pornography. This article lists several LDS resources that may be of interest to you: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday, I blogged about the revived proposal to create a .xxx domain for pornography. This article lists several LDS resources that may be of interest to you: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Pornography will be in the internet whether or not we use .xxx   My biggest concern is that by recognizing pornographers the same was we recognize other companies, organizations, networks, educational institutions, governments and the like it will give a level of legitimacy to evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pornography will be in the internet whether or not we use .xxx   My biggest concern is that by recognizing pornographers the same was we recognize other companies, organizations, networks, educational institutions, governments and the like it will give a level of legitimacy to evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Day</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-914</guid>
		<description>A new TLD has no bearing whatsoever on the effectiveness of what parents teach their children about proper behavior.  Did .tv make television more or less popular, more or less addictive?  I didn't think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new TLD has no bearing whatsoever on the effectiveness of what parents teach their children about proper behavior.  Did .tv make television more or less popular, more or less addictive?  I didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>James W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>An early proposal indicates that the .xxx TLD was made by a trade association of pornographic website owners and operators.  That association claimed 100,000 members with an average 20 websites each.

That's around 2 million pornography websites out there just in that set of operators alone.  Doesn't count all the sites set up by spammers, and other operations.  So that is a very conservative number.  I've even heard 4 million websites exist at the present time.

I doubt it will do anything to have the .xxx domain extension, especially given the dishonest nature of that industry.  And to top that off, many sites plagiarize and steal each others' pornography from discussions I've seen about the industry on antipornography activist sites and bulletin boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An early proposal indicates that the .xxx TLD was made by a trade association of pornographic website owners and operators.  That association claimed 100,000 members with an average 20 websites each.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s around 2 million pornography websites out there just in that set of operators alone.  Doesn&#8217;t count all the sites set up by spammers, and other operations.  So that is a very conservative number.  I&#8217;ve even heard 4 million websites exist at the present time.</p>
<p>I doubt it will do anything to have the .xxx domain extension, especially given the dishonest nature of that industry.  And to top that off, many sites plagiarize and steal each others&#8217; pornography from discussions I&#8217;ve seen about the industry on antipornography activist sites and bulletin boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-911</guid>
		<description>My thought is that the desire for the .xxx shows the growth and explosion and availability of pornography on the internet.  The fact the .xxx domain could become available doesn't worry me, it is the fact that it does make it easier for producers to market and impose it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought is that the desire for the .xxx shows the growth and explosion and availability of pornography on the internet.  The fact the .xxx domain could become available doesn&#8217;t worry me, it is the fact that it does make it easier for producers to market and impose it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>I would echo what &lt;em&gt;Steve M.&lt;/em&gt; said.

I'm not sure what the big deal is.  At least all the porn in the .xxx area would be easily blocked, since the assumption is that it is all inappropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would echo what <em>Steve M.</em> said.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the big deal is.  At least all the porn in the .xxx area would be easily blocked, since the assumption is that it is all inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/01/12/xxx-domain-for-pornography/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Family Research Council warned on its Web site that “pornographers will be given even more opportunities to flood our homes, libraries and society with pornography through the .xxx domain.”&lt;/i&gt;

I'm a bit puzzled by this assertion. Is there any reason why an .xxx domain would give pornographers "even more opportunities to flood our homes" than is currently available to them? Being confined to using .com doesn't seem to be a particular hindrance to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Family Research Council warned on its Web site that “pornographers will be given even more opportunities to flood our homes, libraries and society with pornography through the .xxx domain.”</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit puzzled by this assertion. Is there any reason why an .xxx domain would give pornographers &#8220;even more opportunities to flood our homes&#8221; than is currently available to them? Being confined to using .com doesn&#8217;t seem to be a particular hindrance to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
